“The cost was far too high”

A second attack was ordered for September 19. Alan Palmer describes it  in stark terms and adds a damning indictment of the British attacks.

This time the brunt of the fighting fell on the the 77th (Scottish) Brigade of the 26th Division … and they suffered from battle confusion as grim as in the days of the Crimea. Orders not to attack arrived too late; British troops were caught in their own barrage; a French Zouave regiment failed to understand its task; messengers perished in the murk of the conflict. During six hours of fighting no trenches were won and retained.

After two days the only gains were those secured around Dojran town on the first morning. British casualties were heavy – twice as great as those suffered by the Serbs and the French on the first two days of the battle for the Dobropolje – and the Bulgarian bastion on the Grand Courroné remained unassailed. Technically the Anglo-Greek attacks achieved their strategic purpose: not one Bulgarian unit was moved westward from the Dojran sector. Yet it may be legitimately asked if feints and harassment would not, in this respect, have accomplished as much as an all-out attack against such formidable positions. By the morning of September 20 several of the British infantry battalions could raise only a quarter of their nominal strength. The cost was far too high.

From Alan Palmer’s ‘Defeat of Bulgaria – The Central Powers Begin to Crack’, published in History of the First World War No. 107 by Purnell for BPC Publishing Ltd, London, in cooperation with the Imperial War Museum in the 1970s.

Photograph - Lake Doiran and the high ground held by the Bulgars. © Harry Fecitt
Lake Doiran and the high ground held by the Bulgars. © Harry Fecitt

Author: scswebeditor

Robin Braysher joined the SCS in 2003 and from 2008 has been the Society's web editor. His interest in the campaign comes from his grandfather, Fred, who served as a cyclist with the BSF from 1915 to 1917, mainly in the Struma valley. Robin hands over the role in October 2021 to Andy Hutt. Andy's interest in the campaign comes from his grandfather, Arthur, who served as a Royal Engineer from 1916-1918. All posts prior to February 2021 are by Robin. Opinions expressed in these posts are personal and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Society.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.